Confirm the scope rather than assuming governance work includes the individual L-1A analysis. Identify official charges and professional work separately.
Clarify the separate questions
Ask who reviews the actual role, employment history and qualifying entity relationship. Drafting a corporate resolution does not itself resolve immigration eligibility. Agree on additional work before relying on an estimate for a different purpose.
Clarify the evidence review, document preparation and current official charges. Ask whether the professional who prepared the corporate governance work is also the right person to conduct the individual immigration analysis, since the two engagements can call for different expertise even when they involve the same organization and the same underlying facts. Request a written addendum describing the individual assessment as its own deliverable, with its own scope and timeline, rather than assuming it is automatically bundled into governance work billed for a different purpose. Confirm what the governance engagement actually covered before relying on any earlier estimate to price the individual review, since a resolution or bylaw update addresses a different question than whether a specific role and history qualify. Ask how the two workstreams will be coordinated so that findings from one inform the other without either being treated as a substitute for the other. Raise timing early, since sequencing the individual review after governance work is finalized can avoid redoing analysis if the governance outcome changes the facts being assessed.