Skip to content
FOR BUSINESS LEADERS · SENNEVILLESenneville

Built in Canada.Ready for more.

A Senneville applicant may hold a board seat and also propose to work in a U.S. executive role. Describe those activities separately. A corporate appointment does not itself establish the actual work, qualifying foreign employment or company relationship needed for L-1A. The assessment should follow the duties and evidence rather than the prestige of the title. Hypothetical example: a manufacturer of ultrasonic pipe-inspection probes wants to transfer its foreign production director after assigning routine purchasing to a local team. The file should show the director's decisions over the function, the people who perform the underlying work, and the dated foreign payroll and job records. The applicant's foreign work must include twelve uninterrupted qualifying months during the prior thirty-six months, and the companies must have the required relationship. An L-1A stay has an overall seven-year ceiling. The practical choice is whether the proposed U.S. role is principally executive or managerial on the present organization, rather than a plan to become so after admission.

Talk about L-1A
PurposeExecutive or managerial transfer
Company linkQualifying related businesses
New officeA distinct evidence requirement

IN THIS GUIDE · Distinguish a board appointment from the executive job being proposed

Start with the L-1A eligibility and application overview

01

Identify the capacity in which each activity occurs

Hypothetical example: a person attends board meetings and would also direct a U.S. operating team. Explain which decisions belong to the board collectively and which the individual would make in the proposed job. Do not present every board power as the applicant’s personal executive authority. A board minute should be read with the delegation schedule, budget limits and personnel evidence, not treated as a complete duty description on its own.

02

Describe the actual executive work

Explain responsibilities, discretion and the organization supporting the proposed role. Include routine duties and any limits on authority. An executive title or board resolution can be relevant evidence but does not replace analysis of the work the applicant would primarily perform. Identify the decisions that only the applicant may make and the records that show those decisions were exercised in the foreign role.

03

Establish employment rather than assuming it from office

Prepare dated evidence of the applicant’s actual foreign employment and duties for the relevant qualifying-period review. Ownership, a board seat and employment are different facts. Have their significance assessed instead of assuming that holding office proves the continuous employment requirement. Place payroll, organization charts and reporting documents on the same dates as the foreign role; an undated title list cannot resolve a timing gap.

04

Separate governance from the qualifying entity relationship

Identify the Canadian and U.S. legal entities and their ownership or control relationship. Common directors do not by themselves explain every corporate requirement. If a new office is proposed, review support for the qualifying role within one year and distinguish plans from operations already established. For a new office, compare the first-year staffing plan with the proposed role and identify who will perform production-level work while the operation grows.

05

Prove the qualifying relationship and one continuous year abroad

The qualifying foreign year must be continuous within the relevant three years; US days do not count, although trips do not automatically break it. Identify who performs operational tasks and what the applicant primarily manages or directs. Prove a qualifying parent, branch, subsidiary or affiliate relationship and continuing US and foreign business. US doing business for less than a year requires sufficient new-office premises and support for the qualifying role within a year, with initial approval limited to one year. The category is capped at seven years, and the review should say early whether the intended role is truly managerial or is a hands-on position wearing a management title.

SOURCES FOR THIS GUIDE

Sources reviewed 2026-09-07. This guide covers a preparation focus; it is not an individual eligibility assessment.

PUT THE DETAILS TO WORK

Guides for your next decision.

L-1A · SENNEVILLE

YOUR QUESTIONS.
A CLEARER START.

KEEP EXPLORING

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.