Skip to content
FOR PROFESSIONALS · MERCIERMercier

Your talent.A bigger stage.

Owning a Canadian consulting company neither establishes nor defeats TN eligibility on its own. What matters is the profession and credentials, the prearranged professional work, temporary entry, and who owns and controls the US entity the services go to. Incorporation is a starting fact for that analysis, not the answer to it. A first review should create a dated decision record, not simply collect documents: identify the legal question, the record that can settle it, the responsible person, and the next event that may change the answer. Hypothetical example: a clock-escapement maker owns a Canadian workshop and proposes to advise a U.S. retailer that the maker also finances. The concrete decision is whether the proposed facts can be proved as they will exist on the filing or admission date, rather than as a hoped-for future arrangement. Where a document, payment, ownership right, or duty changes, update the comparison before relying on an earlier explanation.

Talk about TN
PurposeTemporary professional work
Starting pointA qualifying, prearranged role
Key distinctionCitizenship, not residency

IN THIS GUIDE · A consultant with a Canadian corporation assessing a US engagement, where the ownership question turns on the US entity receiving the services

Start with the TN eligibility and application overview

01

What the Canadian corporation does and does not settle

Canadian incorporation is one fact in the full arrangement, not a safe harbour or an automatic bar. Trace the ownership, contracting parties and services, including any US business or entity involved. Sole or controlling ownership of the US entity receiving the professional services is deemed prohibited self-employment. Other structures still require review against the actual TN rules rather than an assumption based on the corporation’s location.

02

Identify the US party receiving the services

Read the engagement documents to see who the client actually is: a US company unrelated to the applicant, a US subsidiary or affiliate of the Canadian corporation, or a US entity the applicant has formed. Each produces a different analysis. Where a US affiliate exists, record its shareholders, directors, and signing authority, since a controlling interest there is the fact that raises the self-employment concern.

03

Document the work as prearranged professional employment

TN requires a qualifying listed profession, credentials that match its specific requirements, and professional work arranged in advance with an identified US entity. A consulting agreement can support that, provided it names the duties, the professional level of the work, the period, and the remuneration. Vague retainer language describing availability rather than defined professional services leaves an officer without the substance the classification requires.

04

Bring the structure to counsel before signing

Layered contracting arrangements, pass-through invoicing, and part ownership of a US client are exactly the facts that need case-specific advice rather than a general rule. Ask counsel to review the draft agreement, the corporate records, and the proposed route into the United States together. Changing an agreement before signature is straightforward; explaining a signed structure that does not fit the classification is considerably harder.

05

Start with primary records: executed agreements, bank or payroll evidence, corporate registers, and the current duty description. A Canadian applicant may seek TN admission at preclearance or the land border with a complete record, or the employer may use the USCIS petition process; a Mexican applicant normally needs a TN visa first. TN cannot be used to work for the applicant’s own U.S. enterprise. A first review should identify which item is missing and whether it can be obtained before a material commitment is made.

06

Sequence the work deliberately: verify the controlling record, compare it with the proposed representation, then decide whether to proceed, revise the transaction, or obtain case-specific advice. A summary, title, payment receipt, or optimistic forecast cannot safely replace the record that answers the governing condition.

SOURCES FOR THIS GUIDE

Sources reviewed 2026-09-07. This guide covers a preparation focus; it is not an individual eligibility assessment.

PUT THE DETAILS TO WORK

Guides for your next decision.

TN · MERCIER

YOUR QUESTIONS.
A CLEARER START.

KEEP EXPLORING

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.