Skip to content
FOR BUSINESS LEADERS · LONGUEUILLongueuil

Built in Canada.Ready for more.

A Longueuil applicant’s transfer plan should explain the business left abroad as well as the proposed U.S. management role. L classification requires the qualifying organization to continue doing business in the United States and at least one other country under the applicable rules. A foreign mailing address or corporate registration alone does not explain continuing operations. Continuing business is a present-tense condition, so the plan has to describe what will be true after the transfer rather than what was true when the company was at its largest. Set out the current customer contracts, the staff who remain, and the premises or arrangements through which the foreign work is actually delivered. A description assembled from last year's company profile answers a question nobody asked.

Talk about L-1A
PurposeExecutive or managerial transfer
Company linkQualifying related businesses
New officeA distinct evidence requirement

IN THIS GUIDE · Explain how the organization will continue operating outside the United States

Start with the L-1A eligibility and application overview

01

Identify the activity that will continue abroad

Hypothetical example: the applicant would move to lead the U.S. operation while the foreign business is being reduced. Describe the actual goods or services, people and arrangements that will remain. Do not treat maintaining a registration or office address as evidence of all required business activity. Hypothetical example: an organisation that monitors clinical trials under contract proposes to move its founder to run a new United States operation while the Canadian arm keeps two long-running study contracts and the staff who service them. The useful evidence is those two contracts, their end dates, the named monitors assigned to them and the invoices issued under them. Naming a sector establishes nothing; naming the contracts, the people and the money establishes something a reader can check.

02

Explain who performs and directs the remaining work

Identify the actual responsibilities abroad and the applicant’s retained duties, if any. Describe the proposed U.S. managerial or executive work and its support separately. The plan should not assign the same unperformed operational tasks to both offices without explaining who does them. Write the two operations as two columns rather than one narrative. For each, list who holds the customer relationship, who performs the work, who signs it off, and who is authorized to commit the entity. Where the same person appears in both columns for the same task, explain how working time divides and who covers the gap. A plan in which the applicant remains the only person capable of delivering the foreign work tends to describe an absence rather than a continuing operation.

03

Document the qualifying organization and employment

Provide the actual legal entities, ownership or control evidence and relevant foreign-employment history. Have the continuous-year requirement and relevant period assessed individually. Continuing business, a qualifying relationship and the applicant’s role are connected but distinct requirements. Assemble the corporate records as a chain rather than a pile: constituting documents, the share register or the instrument establishing ownership or control, and any intermediate holding entity between the two operations. Then set the applicant's employment history against a calendar. The requirement is one continuous year of qualifying employment abroad within the three years preceding the application, so gaps, leaves and periods spent inside the United States each need dates rather than approximations.

04

Review reductions before relying on the transfer plan

Explain proposed closures, sales or staffing changes and their effect on ongoing business and the applicant’s duties. A new U.S. office also needs the relevant first-year support analysis. Have material changes assessed before treating an earlier plan as still applicable. Ask for the decision record behind each planned reduction: the board minute, the notice to a landlord, the termination letters, the date each takes effect. A reduction that has been discussed is a different fact from one that has been executed, and the file should say which it is. Where the United States operation is new, initial new-office approval is limited to one year and the extension stage examines the operation that actually developed, so a first-year plan the company does not intend to follow creates a problem twelve months later rather than solving one now.

SOURCES FOR THIS GUIDE

Sources reviewed 2026-09-07. This guide covers a preparation focus; it is not an individual eligibility assessment.

PUT THE DETAILS TO WORK

Guides for your next decision.

L-1A · LONGUEUIL

YOUR QUESTIONS.
A CLEARER START.

KEEP EXPLORING

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.