No. Explain the underlying special or advanced knowledge and its use in the proposed assignment, together with the other L requirements.
Assess knowledge rather than presentation skill
Show what the applicant knows about the organization’s product or processes and how the supporting examples establish it. A polished training deck and positive feedback do not by themselves answer that question.
An internally built system is one of the better fact patterns for L-1B, because the distinction the statute draws between organizational knowledge and general skill maps cleanly onto software nobody else runs. Identify company-specific products, processes, or procedures the employee understands; describe difficult judgments made; and compare that understanding with ordinary worker knowledge. Describe what the employee learned, applied and can now explain beyond ordinary familiarity; years of travel alone do not establish the standard, and a labour shortage is not the legal test. Support the account with training or project records tied to the company, and let counsel apply the legal standard to those facts rather than to a general assertion of expertise. The principal’s case also must document the required uninterrupted twelve-month foreign employment period, qualifying related organizations that conduct business, and specialized knowledge of company products or advanced company procedures.