Read it.
Use it.
Focused guides for the questions that need more than a quick answer. Each includes a worksheet to prepare your next conversation.
Guides for your next decision.
Build a TN employer evidence brief before drafting the letter
Read & prepare Applicant planningKeep an L-1A new-office record from approval to extension
Read & prepare Applicant planningCompare the E-2 evidence for a startup and a business purchase
Read & prepare U.S. destination planningCanadian RN planning for New York State
Read & prepare U.S. destination planningCanadian RN planning for California
Read & prepareSeven decisions, answered before you prepare.
Explain the compensation arrangement without confusing the payer with the whole TN case
An Otterburn Park professional may see a payroll provider or reimbursement arrangement alongside the proposed employer. Identify the actual employment and services before treating a payment label as the answer to eligibility. A first review should produce a short map of the offering entity, the entity directing the work, the listed profession, and the records that prove citizenship and qualifications. The reader must decide whether the documents describe one coherent temporary professional engagement or several roles that need separate treatment. The payer can be relevant, but the support letter, agreement, and actual work arrangement settle the core question.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Describe who is responsible for the proposed work
- Retain the professional and citizenship requirements
- Assess the arrangement rather than inventing a payroll rule
Reassess the route when the proposed principal changes
An Otterburn Park business or household may decide that a different person should take the U.S. role. Start the citizenship and individual-evidence assessment again for that person rather than carrying over the first applicant’s eligibility. The first review should identify the proposed principal’s own citizenship, immigration history, qualifications, and source of authority in the business. The concrete decision is whether that person has an independently supportable route now or whether the organization needs a different principal or timeline. Canadian permanent residence can be an important fact, but it does not convert into citizenship or transfer another person’s eligibility.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Identify the replacement applicant’s actual citizenship
- Keep the alternative category specific to the person
- Revise the documents to reflect the actual proposal
Explain how a revised hiring forecast affects the business case
An Otterburn Park investor may revise a U.S. staffing plan before the enterprise is ready to operate. Assess the real economic plan rather than adding an arbitrary number of employees to make the proposal appear eligible. A first review should separate commitments already exposed to loss from future operating forecasts and from funds still under the investor’s control. The reader must decide whether the revised plan remains credible with the actual contracts, opening date, and available capital, rather than treating a headcount target as the test. A nonmarginal analysis asks what the real enterprise can support, not what number would sound persuasive.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Connect the staffing forecast to the actual operation
- Use the nonmarginality test without inventing a quota
- Preserve the investment and control evidence
Make the first-year evidence describe actual progress after a change in the operating plan
An Otterburn Park company may alter its U.S. launch after a new-office L approval. Keep the evidence of what happened separate from the original forecast so a later assessment can evaluate the real operation and role. A first review should create a dated comparison between the approved forecast and the actual premises, revenue activity, staffing, and duties. The concrete decision is whether a changed plan still supports the requested role within the original first-year period, not whether the business remains attractive in general. Record the foreign employment year separately and keep the organization’s qualifying relationship and international business evidence current.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Preserve the dates and conditions of the actual approval
- Explain the role under the category requested
- Maintain the international organization and extension record
Assess an intended change in foreign operations before choosing a transfer route
An Otterburn Park owner may plan to consolidate activities while expanding in the United States. Describe what qualifying international business would actually continue rather than assuming the corporate registration alone preserves an L case. A first review should place two evidence tracks side by side: the organization and foreign-employment facts for L, and the nationality, ownership, capital, and operating facts for E-2. The decision is not simply which label sounds faster; it is which complete set of facts can be proved without omitting a governing condition. A changed foreign operation can be decisive for L, while an E-2 case still needs capital irrevocably committed at risk in a real enterprise that is not marginal.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Map the organization that will actually operate
- Keep the person’s L conditions intact
- Compare E-2 through its own complete business facts
Recheck the household’s status plan when the principal changes category
An Otterburn Park family may reconsider the principal’s U.S. route after reviewing the employer or enterprise. Identify what that change would mean for each relative rather than carrying over the first route’s work assumptions. A first review should make a separate line for each household member: relationship evidence, age, citizenship, current status, intended travel date, and any plan to work or study. The concrete decision is whether the proposed principal route supports each person’s real needs, especially where a spouse expects employment or a child is near 21. A household calendar is useful only when it is tied to the actual authorization and document record for each person.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Start with the actual qualifying relationship and documents
- Compare the spouse rules explicitly
- Keep age, study and authorized stay visible
Separate private service invoices from capital and the official government gift
An Otterburn Park applicant may receive professional or project invoices while comparing investor routes. Identify the recipient and purpose of every charge before treating the total paid as immigration capital or a Gold Card gift. A first review should classify every payment by recipient, legal purpose, refund terms, and supporting record before totals are compared. The reader must decide whether funds are capital placed at risk for EB-5, private professional or project charges, or a Gold Card payment by the applicant to the U.S. government. Gold Card is not a conventional visa, and a provider invoice cannot turn into either EB-5 capital or an official government payment by description alone.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Identify the actual EB-5 investment requirement
- Use the official Gold Card amounts and sequence
- Retain the separate immigration milestones
- Reconcile the recipient before reconciling the total