Provide relevant entity and operating records that identify the actual organization, locations and employer relationship. Explain any inconsistent names or descriptions.
Connect the organizational account to original records
Do not replace a legal company name with branch in historical documents. Use a clear explanation of what each record establishes and identify any ownership, control or operating facts still needing review. Assemble the records in the order an outside reader would want them: what each company is, who owns it, what it does, and how the two are connected.
Against each document write one line saying what it proves, and be candid where a document proves less than hoped. Hypothetical example: a green-roof installation firm supplies a marketing brochure showing offices in two countries under one name. A brochure shows how a group presents itself; it does not show ownership, control, or that either office is doing business.
The registry extract, the share register and the financial statements do that work. Where historical records use the older wording, leave them as they are and add a short note explaining the terminology instead of reissuing documents to match a later description. A file whose documents visibly disagree with one another invites a request for further evidence, while a file that explains its own inconsistencies usually does not.
Number the exhibits and cross-reference them from the explanation, so that a reader checking one assertion can find its support without hunting for it.