No. Follow the official sequence and satisfy the actual review requirements. A gift is not a substitute for requested evidence or eligibility.
Avoid treating money as an evidentiary shortcut
The current principal gift follows successful vetting and official instructions: US$1 million individually or US$2 million corporately. The initial US$15,000 processing fee is nonrefundable; neither payment guarantees acceptance of an incomplete explanation. Keep the money questions in their own column and answer them in sequence, since the amounts are not all payable at the same point.
Processing of US$15,000 per person is nonrefundable, and it does not become refundable because a document could not be produced. The larger payment runs from the applicant to the U.S. government and follows successful vetting and official instructions rather than accompanying an application, so it is not a way to move a case forward while an evidence question stays open.
Hypothetical example: an irrigation systems manufacturer offers to cover the corporate amounts for a key employee whose former employer will not release a reference. The offer resolves a funding question and leaves the evidence question exactly where it was. Ask instead what the process would accept in place of that reference, what obtaining it would cost, and how long it would take.
Verify every figure and term against current official program materials before relying on it. Ask the employer to put any funding offer in writing, including what it covers, what it does not, and what becomes of it if the employment relationship ends.