No. The reduced level applies only where the investment itself is in a qualifying targeted employment area or infrastructure project, evidenced in the record. A price printed in an advertisement is a seller's claim. Ask which basis is asserted and what document establishes it for that specific project site. The reverse error is just as common: assuming the standard level must apply because a promoter never mentioned the reduced one. Both levels rest on documented facts about the project rather than on whichever figure was quoted first.
Separating the price tag from the qualifying basis
Two things travel together and are often confused: the amount you invest and the reason that amount is permitted. Marketing tends to lead with the number. A petition leads with the basis.
Also confirm the job-creation method the project relies on, since permitted approaches differ between a direct investment and a regional centre project, and at least ten qualifying full-time jobs must be attributable to your investment. The investor, spouse and children are excluded from that count; do not extend that exclusion automatically to every other relative. Ask for the basis in one sentence and for the document proving it in the same reply.
A promoter who can name the classification, the site it attaches to and the filing where it appears has answered the question; one who responds with the designation of a regional centre has changed the subject, since designation speaks to the centre rather than to this project's classification.