No. Assess the actual special or advanced organizational knowledge and the other transfer requirements. Communication ability alone is not the complete standard.
Explain the work and knowledge separately
Identify the process or product knowledge used in the U.S. duties and how the applicant acquired it. A language skill may help perform the work without establishing every condition for the classification.
Explain what the employee actually understands and applies, and distinguish general industry information from the qualifying company knowledge claimed. L-1B does not require knowledge to be unique or proprietary, but general fluency or an ordinary occupational skill is insufficient. Skill that any seasoned grower could bring is general; knowledge of the company's own propagation protocol, developed and refined inside the organization, can be specialized. The core decision is whether the proposed role requires the worker’s special company knowledge rather than merely technical competence. Qualifying knowledge may concern the employer's product, service, research, equipment, techniques, management, processes or procedures; it need not be unavailable in the U.S. labour market or held by only a few employees. The principal’s L-1B case must stand on the employee’s own special or advanced company knowledge, an uninterrupted qualifying foreign year in the relevant three-year window, and active related entities.