Skip to content
PROGRAMME BRIEFING · BLAINVILLEBlainville

A new route.Know the details.

Consider a hypothetical Nevada software company that sponsored one employee, then asked whether the US$2,000,000 gift can be moved to a second hire while the first case is still pending. This Blainville edition looks at the transfer mechanism, the abandonment condition in the executive order, and the records that decision requires. This is not a conventional investment-visa route. For an individual, the applicant personally makes the required unrestricted gift under official instructions for deposit in a Treasury fund; it is not capital placed at risk in a private business. The separate immigration review still requires eligibility, admissibility, and visa availability, so a promised transfer cannot replace the new applicant’s own review.

Talk about GOLD CARD
Official individual contributionUS$1 million
DHS processing feeUS$15,000
Review date7 September 2026

IN THIS GUIDE · Corporate transfer of a Gold Card gift while an earlier employee case is pending

Start with the GOLD CARD eligibility and application overview

01

What a corporate sponsor actually holds

For a corporate principal, the program describes US$15,000 in processing fees per employee and a US$2,000,000 gift. The person seeking status is the employee. A company cannot unilaterally assign someone's lawful permanent resident status as if it were an asset on the balance sheet. What the executive order describes is reuse of the prior gift to sponsor another employee, subject to new vetting and the transfer requirements in force at the time. Hypothetical example: An architectural-acoustics company wants to replace a departing corporate cardholder with a new employee before the former person’s status has been resolved. The board must first identify the actual program stage and the written requirements for any transfer.

02

The abandonment condition

The executive order's process includes abandonment of status by the prior holder, so a transfer is not a neutral administrative swap seen from the first employee's side. Where the first case is pending rather than decided, the position differs from one where status was granted, and the official instructions for that stage govern. Statements made to the employee, including oral ones, may be legally relevant; preserve them rather than assuming they carry no weight. Create a two-column record: one side for the former holder’s notices and status evidence, the other for the proposed employee’s vetting, identity, and eligibility documents. That separation prevents a corporate staffing decision from being mistaken for an immigration determination.

03

Fees that exist only with an actual mechanism

Corporate sponsorship includes a published 1% annual maintenance charge. The separate 5% charge applies when the transfer mechanism is used; the annual charge should not be treated as conditional on a transfer. Reuse of a prior US$2 million gift is contemplated under applicable transfer requirements, so do not assume a new full gift or automatic reuse. Family amounts remain US$15,000 plus US$1 million per eligible joining spouse or child. Keep processing charges, any annual charge, and the gift instruction in distinct entries with the corresponding official confirmation. A company ledger can show its internal authorization, but it does not establish that a payment has reached the government through the required channel.

04

Waiting for instructions is a decision too

Establish the existing case’s stage and whether a gift has actually been made, then request instructions for the proposed change. The ordinary application sequence does not by itself establish that a pending-case substitution is available. Do not move funds or treat a board resolution as agency authorization. Category eligibility, visa availability and the new employee’s vetting remain substantive questions rather than administrative details. Ask for the official procedure before offering a start date, ending sponsorship, or announcing a replacement. The difficult decision is often whether to wait for an answer that preserves options rather than create facts the governing process does not recognize.

SOURCES FOR THIS GUIDE

Sources reviewed 2026-09-07. This guide covers a preparation focus; it is not an individual eligibility assessment.

GOLD CARD · BLAINVILLE

YOUR QUESTIONS.
A CLEARER START.

KEEP EXPLORING

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.