Read it.
Use it.
Focused guides for the questions that need more than a quick answer. Each includes a worksheet to prepare your next conversation.
Guides for your next decision.
Build a TN employer evidence brief before drafting the letter
Read & prepare Applicant planningKeep an L-1A new-office record from approval to extension
Read & prepare Applicant planningCompare the E-2 evidence for a startup and a business purchase
Read & prepare U.S. destination planningCanadian RN planning for New York State
Read & prepare U.S. destination planningCanadian RN planning for California
Read & prepareSeven decisions, answered before you prepare.
Describe a proposed worksite change through the actual duties and arrangement
A Saint-Amable professional may be asked to work at a different U.S. location while an offer is being prepared. Identify whether the real employer, duties or terms change rather than treating the new address as either automatically harmless or automatically disqualifying. A first review should compare the signed offer, the actual client arrangement, and the professional duties line by line. Hypothetical example: a forensic acoustician is moved from preparing reports for one employer to directing a client’s field crew at the new site. The decision is whether that change alters the employer, profession, or authorized arrangement, and the record that settles it is the current signed assignment description rather than a map pin.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Compare the old proposal with the actual new one
- Retain the listed-profession analysis
- Assess the applicable next step before the changed work
Explain identity-name differences without treating them as a change in citizenship
A Saint-Amable resident may have authentic records issued under different names. Identify the person and the actual citizenship evidence, keeping the name-history question separate from whether the applicant qualifies for a U.S. category. A first review should create a name-and-document table, identify which record proves citizenship, and choose the category only after those facts are separated. Hypothetical example: a stained-glass restorer holds a Canadian permanent-resident card under one surname and a Mexican passport under another. The decision is whether authentic linkage records establish identity and treaty citizenship, not whether Canadian residence can stand in for either point.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Identify the actual citizenship and authentic documents
- Keep each category’s evidence distinct
- Make a clear document cross-reference
Explain a business plan that depends heavily on one proposed customer
A Saint-Amable investor may build a U.S. forecast around a major prospective customer. Document what is actually agreed and how the enterprise would operate rather than turning an expected relationship into guaranteed revenue. A first review should separate signed customer commitments from estimates, test cash requirements if that customer does not buy, and identify the payment that is truly committed. Hypothetical example: a commercial-laundry water-recovery business forecasts most first-year revenue from one hotel group whose procurement approval is still pending. The decision is whether the operating plan remains credible without treating a negotiation as revenue already earned.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Distinguish the customer evidence from the assumption
- Assess economic capacity without a customer quota
- Keep funds and control conditions complete
Keep an established foreign business’s age separate from the U.S. new-office timeline
A Saint-Amable company may have operated abroad for years before opening in the United States. Date the U.S. activity and the individual’s qualifying foreign employment separately; the foreign company’s age does not answer both questions. A first review should build three dated files: the foreign organization’s operations, the employee’s qualifying work, and the U.S. organization’s actual start. Hypothetical example: a specialty algae-cultivation supplier signs a U.S. lease after years abroad, but the transferee’s role changed from laboratory supervisor to company manager only recently. The decision is which dates and duties satisfy the category, not which company has the oldest brand.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Establish when the U.S. organization actually began doing business
- Establish the employee and category-specific evidence
- Retain the organization and extension conditions
Distinguish use of a business brand from the ownership and authority required by L or E-2
A Saint-Amable operator may obtain a franchise or licence to use a U.S. brand. Read the actual enterprise ownership and decision rights instead of assuming the brand agreement creates an intracompany transfer or investor eligibility. A first review should compare the corporate-control documents with the investor’s ownership, the employee’s foreign work history, and the operating commitments. Hypothetical example: a ceramic kiln-control manufacturer may buy a brand licence while its founder also seeks to move an employee from a related foreign company. The decision is whether the records support the qualifying L relationship, the E-2 investor enterprise, or neither, before money is committed to the wrong pathway.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Test the real L relationship
- Test the actual investor enterprise
- Preserve conditions specific to a launch or owner
Keep an employer’s family benefits separate from dependent immigration eligibility
A Saint-Amable applicant may receive an offer that includes relocation help or family benefits. Those commercial terms can support planning, but each relative still needs the applicable relationship, category and documents. A first review should make one line for every family member showing relationship, age, current document, intended activity, and the principal category. Hypothetical example: an urban tree-canopy data firm offers a move to one parent while a 20-year-old child plans a separate paid internship. The decision is whether each person has required dependent status or independent authorization before the employer treats the package as a single permission.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Identify who can qualify under the intended category
- Apply the actual work and study distinctions
- Keep benefits and immigration milestones on different lines
Check who is counted in an EB-5 job claim before comparing it with corporate Gold Card sponsorship
A Saint-Amable applicant may hear a project describe everyone who works around the business as part of its job total. Identify the applicable EB-5 framework and qualifying employment rather than treating any list of people as sufficient evidence. A first review should identify the claimed jobs, the evidence for each job, the investor’s capital record, and the official Gold Card payment instruction as separate files. Hypothetical example: a recycled-aviation-textiles processor offers a corporate Gold Card arrangement while an investor is considering its regional-center project. The decision is whether the project independently supports EB-5 capital, jobs, and conditional residence, rather than treating a corporate payment as a substitute for any EB-5 requirement.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Assess the actual qualifying jobs
- Keep the capital and immigration stages complete
- Identify the separate Gold Card official arrangement
- Ask what the employment label proves