No. Deciding in advance to file something incomplete is a poor plan: an incomplete response can lead to a request for evidence or a refusal. Instead, establish what the sealing order actually permits, seek a carve-out or court relief if needed, and file with an explanation of any redaction that remains.
Working out what the order actually forbids
The clause may bind the parties from public statements while allowing disclosure to a government agency, or it may require notice to the other side first. Those are different answers, and only the text tells you which. Where the agreement is in French, a USCIS filing needs a full certified English translation of the whole document; a consular stage may set different language requirements.
Missing documents do not merely delay — they can drive a request or a refusal. Rather than relying on a personal reading of an ambiguous confidentiality clause, ask opposing counsel or the court for written confirmation of what disclosure the order actually permits before the filing deadline arrives. A redacted filing should mark exactly which portions are withheld and state the reason for each redaction, so the reviewer can tell whether a redaction is minor formatting or something that could affect the outcome.
Build in enough time to request a carve-out or court relief before the deadline, since that process rarely moves quickly enough to start once the filing is already due.