No. A private employment report is not the government’s Gold Card vetting or admissibility decision.
Read the report within its actual scope
Check what was examined and for what purpose. Do not present the absence of findings in a limited report as proof that every immigration question has been resolved or that permanent residence is approved.
The individual route is designed for exactly that situation, subject to vetting, the gift and the EB-1 or EB-2 conditions. A request for the initial processing charge is not the same as the later instructed gift after successful vetting. Identify the proposed applicant and the actual corporate sponsor before treating a benefits letter as an application plan. Has the applicant ever been refused a U.S. visa, overstayed, or had a criminal matter, however minor, that could raise an admissibility question? A board approval or employment benefit can explain the proposed funding but is not the immigration decision. The case proceeds through EB-1 or EB-2 classification, so eligibility, admissibility, and visa availability need their own review. Only after vetting is the US$1 million gift to the United States requested. The third point is procedural: the fee is paid before the vetting, so an applicant who is unsuccessful has still paid it.