Creating a company does not itself authorize the person’s work. Have the actual activity and immigration implications reviewed before spending on a structure intended to solve a work-permission question.
Separate entity formation from authorization
Formation, accounting and contract costs serve commercial purposes. Budget immigration review and applicable official charges separately; an invoice issued by a new company does not answer who performed the services or where.
Separate relevant document work, professional preparation and current official charges. The Form I-129 base fee, the anti-fraud fee and, depending on the company's size and status, a reduced or waived asylum-program fee, all on Form G-1055.
An approval or spending limit describes financial delegation, not the classification test; connect it to what the applicant actually directs. Confirm the relationship between the entity being formed and the existing foreign organization before completing formation, since a freshly created company without a documented ownership or control tie to that organization cannot serve as the qualifying petitioner no matter how carefully it is structured. Ask who inside the operation actually assigns, reviews and evaluates the applicant’s work, because an invoicing arrangement or a client list does not show which organization directs the activity. Request a written summary distinguishing the entity’s tax or liability purpose from its role in the immigration filing, so the same document is not asked to do both jobs. Raise the supervision question with the professional handling formation before signing incorporation paperwork, since correcting the relationship afterward is harder than confirming it first.