Explain whether the example remains evidence of relevant knowledge and what the U.S. role now requires. Do not imply that a terminated supply arrangement remains active.
Separate the history of learning from the current assignment
A past assessment may show how the employee learned an internal process, but the proposed job still needs a current explanation. Review material changes before relying on the old supplier project as the transfer’s purpose. When a supplier relationship ends, the commercial record often goes with it: access is revoked, the portal closes, and the correspondence sits in an account nobody can open.
The knowledge does not disappear, but the proof of it can. Export what is needed while access still exists, including the decision records, the exception approvals and the versions of the internal standard the applicant worked on, and store them somewhere the employer controls and can produce later. Then write the current United States duties as their own dated document rather than letting a closed project stand in for a description of the proposed role.
Note also that the maximum period available in this category is five years, so a plan assuming an indefinite runway should be tested against that limit before commitments are made. Hypothetical example: a metal-fabrication and tooling shop retires a supplier portal, and the decision records establishing one employee's part in the qualification method survive only because they were exported beforehand.