It may make the transactions readable, but lawful source and ownership still need evidence appropriate to how the money was acquired.
Solve readability and substance separately
A bank statement can show movement without proving why the sender was entitled to the funds. Keep the acquisition records and transfer path connected instead of treating a clearer scan as a complete source explanation. Match the evidence to the way the money was actually acquired, because each route has its own natural record.
Employment income points to pay records and tax filings across the years in question. A business sale points to the sale agreement, the closing statement, the corporate resolutions and the tax treatment of the proceeds. A gift points to the donor's own source, a deed or letter of gift, and evidence that the donor had the means.
A loan points to the agreement, the security and whether the borrower is personally liable. Hypothetical example: the owner of a turfgrass sod farm sells a parcel of land and uses the proceeds. Clear statements will show the deposit arriving, but the agreement of purchase and sale, the lawyer's trust statement and the tax return reporting the disposition are what explain why the money was the seller's to receive.
Assemble the acquisition documents first and let the bank records connect them, rather than expecting statements to carry the whole explanation alone.