No. Explain what the award actually represents, where relevant, and separately document the applicant’s duties, authority and organizational support.
Give compensation records their proper purpose
An incentive document may explain compensation without establishing current control or managerial duties. Use actual authority and employment records for those facts, and do not present future interests as already effective. Hypothetical example: a geotechnical laboratory network grants a division head a share option in the same month the transfer is proposed, and the file arrives with the award notice at the front.
Move it to the back. Lead with the documents that show the position: the delegation of authority, the organizational chart with names and titles, performance objectives written in managerial terms, and correspondence in which the applicant exercises the authority claimed, such as approvals signed, budgets set and appointments made. If the award is included at all, include what it actually says, including vesting conditions and effective dates, so that nobody reading the file infers present control from a future entitlement.
Where a document is dated after the proposed transfer, say so on its face rather than leaving the sequence to be reconstructed later. Keep the compensation file complete but separate, and state in one line what each document is offered to prove. A file that mixes the two invites the question of whether the role can be shown without the award at all.