No. Review the actual investment and risk terms rather than equating liquidity with a repayment guarantee. The balance may serve obligations other than returning investor funds.
Read the obligations attached to the money
Separate reserve restrictions, operating needs and any proposed distribution terms. Do not count an anticipated return as certain household income or assume immigration approval compels the project to repay. Hypothetical example: a drilling equipment leasing project advertises a reserve covering two years of lease payments and a stated intention to return capital in year six.
Read the documents behind both statements. A reserve is an operating cushion the enterprise may spend, an intention is not an obligation, and a term that did create an obligation to repay would raise its own question about whether the capital is genuinely at risk. Separate the money leaving the household into its actual categories: the qualifying investment itself, any administrative or subscription charge, professional fees, and government charges confirmed at the time each step is taken.
Ask which of those are refundable, under what conditions and to whom, and take the answer from the agreement rather than from a conversation. Then ask what happens to each category if the petition is denied or withdrawn, and write the answers down before signing anything. Ask as well how an administrative charge is treated if the investment is later reduced or the subscription is not accepted, and whether that charge sits inside or outside the qualifying amount.