Not automatically. Assess what the role actually involves and how those tasks relate to professional industrial design. The applicant must also meet the precise credential alternative, Canadian or Mexican citizenship and other TN requirements. A title or portfolio alone does not decide the case. The pivot is who carries the commercial result. Should the employer keep responsibility for revenue while the applicant is paid to explain design choices, the professional character survives the presentations. Should the applicant be measured on accounts won, a design title cannot repair what is in substance a sales position. Settle which description the letter can honestly support, then build the file from there.
Compare the complete duty mix
An explanation of design choices to a client differs from responsibility for closing accounts. Describe both if both occur. Have the actual role assessed rather than inventing a permitted percentage of marketing activity or removing inconvenient duties from the letter.
Two records settle this faster than any conversation. A compensation schedule shows whether earnings depend on sales; the reporting line shows whether the applicant answers to a design lead or to a commercial director. Should those two point in opposite directions, treat the discrepancy itself as the question to resolve rather than adopting whichever version reads better.
Citizenship, the listed profession and its specific qualification requirement must each be met on their own terms, and none of them is reached by rebalancing a duty description.