Do not assume so. Check the actual activity and destination rules. The immigration analysis also needs the offered work to fit a listed profession and the applicant to satisfy its credential requirements, Canadian or Mexican citizenship and the other TN conditions.
Replace the label with a task description
Provide examples of advice, review and decisions expected from the employee. A regulator and immigration reviewer may need different facts from that account. Obtain answers to both questions rather than treating one clearance as sufficient for the other.
Ask the licensing body’s registration office for the written scope attached to the applicant’s current status, and read what it names. Such a document normally states a class of registration, an effective date, and either conditions or none — and it is the paper that settles whether a given task falls inside or outside the permitted scope. An employer’s assurance does not appear on it.
Hypothetical example: a veterinarian without a destination licence is told that reviewing feed formulations for an employer’s technical team is administrative work; the licensing body’s own letter names diagnosis and prescribing as the restricted acts and says nothing whatever about formulation review, which leaves the question open rather than answered. Where the record is silent, put a narrower question naming the exact task instead of reading silence as permission. The immigration side turns on different paper again: the listed profession entry, and the credential that meets what it requires.