A summary should be identified accurately and supported by genuine facts. Its existence alone does not prove the applicant personally acquired or applied the described knowledge.
Trace the explanation to underlying work
Use relevant records of the applicant’s actual decisions, training and contributions. Review any summary for errors and unsupported claims. Do not imply personal authorship or historical use that did not occur.
Select genuine examples showing the employee’s special or advanced organizational knowledge and present use. Describe the applicant’s experience accurately, including knowledge shared with colleagues. A knowledgeable explanation, appropriately handled records or a nonconfidential description may help, depending on the actual evidence. Do not infer advanced knowledge from the number of passport stamps or claim personal responsibility for every team result. Do not present a public certification as if it described every internal method or the applicant’s personal contribution. L-1B preparation should explain the knowledge with genuine examples and corroboration rather than invent a manual or assume undocumented knowledge cannot qualify. Avoid overclaiming exclusive authorship; an accurate explanation of substantive judgment is stronger than a slide deck bearing one person’s name. The usual mistake is treating placement in the author list as proof of every technical contribution.