No. Explain the actual special or advanced organizational knowledge and its use in the role. Familiarity with software alone does not establish all requirements.
Identify what the employee understands beyond tool operation
Describe relevant product constraints or internal methods and the employee’s experience applying them. The purpose is to establish the actual knowledge, not merely to show access to a company platform.
The statutory definition is anchored in the petitioning organization's product, service, research, equipment, techniques, management or interests, or an advanced level of knowledge of its processes and procedures. List the migration decisions the employee can explain, how that understanding was acquired, why it is uncommon within the organization, and exactly where the U.S. assignment will use it. Knowledge of a commercially available system, taught by its manufacturer and available to any purchaser’s staff, is industry skill rather than knowledge special to your employer. Publication may supply context, but public access neither defeats nor establishes specialized knowledge. If the company altered the line, developed its own sequence of steps to protect flavour or yield, and documented that method only internally, the knowledge belongs to the company. General professional skill alone is not enough, but the knowledge need not be proprietary, unique or unavailable across the industry or workforce.