They can provide context, but explain what the applicant actually did and what decisions or work each entry represents.
Connect the entry to the actual work
A meeting title may be ambiguous. Use appropriate supporting records and factual explanations without adding invented detail. Distinguish the applicant’s role from other participants’ responsibilities and preserve the original meaning.
Provide the revised job description, relevant staffing records and an explanation of transferred tasks. With ownership records for both companies showing the same individual or group owns and controls each in roughly the same proportions: share registers, articles, shareholder agreements and, where relevant, tax filings that list owners. Pair the chart with payroll or contractor records, role descriptions, examples of delegated decisions, and an explanation of how overseas support serves the proposed US function. Gather the committee charter and minutes, but add organization charts, job descriptions, reporting lines, delegated assignments, budget authority, examples of recommendations and records showing who performed the underlying analysis. Arrange the exhibits in the order a reviewer would test them: ownership records, foreign payroll and duties, U.S. role, then current organization evidence. Reporting charts, delegation records, payroll history, and examples of independent decisions carry more weight than a map of outlets.