Read it.
Use it.
Focused guides for the questions that need more than a quick answer. Each includes a worksheet to prepare your next conversation.
Guides for your next decision.
Build a TN employer evidence brief before drafting the letter
Read & prepare Applicant planningKeep an L-1A new-office record from approval to extension
Read & prepare Applicant planningCompare the E-2 evidence for a startup and a business purchase
Read & prepare U.S. destination planningCanadian RN planning for New York State
Read & prepare U.S. destination planningCanadian RN planning for California
Read & prepareSeven decisions, answered before you prepare.
Distinguish an examination result from the credential actually required for TN
A Saint-Mathieu-de-Beloeil applicant may have passed an examination while another credential is still being issued. Identify exactly what the profession permits and what the applicant already holds before describing the qualification as complete. A first review should sort records into identity, citizenship, profession, credential, and employment-arrangement evidence. It should identify the exact listed qualification and any missing record before a start date is announced. A Canadian citizen can seek TN classification while requesting admission, while an employer may use an I-129 filing with USCIS. Neither route permits a self-directed arrangement through an enterprise the applicant wholly owns or controls. The decision is whether the actual record proves a listed alternative now, rather than whether a future document may arrive soon.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Label each document according to what it proves
- Match the actual evidence to the profession’s alternatives
- Ask a precise readiness question
Check the nationality column in a business ownership worksheet
A Saint-Mathieu-de-Beloeil venture may use a shareholder table prepared for another purpose. Verify whether its nationality column means citizenship, residence or incorporation before relying on it for a U.S. category. A first review should produce a source table showing each owner, citizenship evidence, ownership percentage, voting rights, and the date of the record. Canadian permanent residence is an immigration status, not proof of Canadian citizenship, and it does not replace the distinct conditions for TN, E-2, or L. Trace every conclusion to a passport, citizenship record, corporate register, or other primary document rather than relying on a spreadsheet label. The decision is which category the verified facts can support.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Identify the actual meaning of the column
- Trace investor nationality through real ownership
- Keep a transfer comparison on separate evidence
Reconcile a budget in Canadian dollars with the actual U.S. investment transactions
A Saint-Mathieu-de-Beloeil investor may budget in one currency and pay suppliers in another. Record actual conversion and receipt evidence rather than treating a preferred exchange-rate assumption as completed investment. A first review should reconcile each source account, conversion, transfer, and recipient record into one dated funds path. It should identify which amount is actually committed to the enterprise and what remains available to be recalled. E-2 requires lawful funds that are substantially invested, committed beyond easy withdrawal, and exposed to commercial risk in a real enterprise that is not marginal. Tie the amount to the investor’s ownership or control and authority to develop and direct, rather than treating a currency worksheet as the entire case.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Keep the estimate and transaction in separate fields
- Assess the capital actually committed
- Connect the reconciled figure to the business
Date the launch milestones without using the earliest convenient document as the opening date
A Saint-Mathieu-de-Beloeil company may have registration, lease, order and service dates in its launch file. Identify what happened on each date before describing the U.S. operation’s period of doing business. A first review should produce a dated activity chart and a separate eligibility checklist instead of selecting whichever event gives the most convenient anniversary. It must confirm the qualifying corporate relationship and the transferee’s continuous foreign year in the relevant three-year period. L-1A is generally capped at seven years and L-1B at five years, although initial new-office approval cannot exceed one year. Decide which activity date the records truly establish, then test premises, staffing, and the proposed role against the applicable rule.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Create a chronology of actual activity
- Apply the relevant new-office conditions
- Connect the chronology with the actual case record
Identify which facts from another applicant’s case can actually describe the new proposal
A Saint-Mathieu-de-Beloeil company may have prepared an earlier L or E-2 case for someone else. Review the new person and arrangement rather than treating the old result as an approval of every later applicant. A first review should produce two separate evidence lists before anyone chooses a route. For L, confirm the qualifying corporate relationship, required international business, and the transferee’s continuous qualifying foreign year within the relevant three years; L-1A and L-1B stay are generally capped at seven and five years respectively. For E-2, test treaty nationality, ownership and control, lawful funds committed beyond easy withdrawal and exposed to commercial risk, and a real enterprise that is not marginal. Choose the route whose decisive conditions can be supported by the actual person’s records.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Separate shared company facts from individual qualifications
- Assess the investor’s actual rights and funds
- Make the comparison record person-specific
Distinguish an old work-authorization document from the spouse’s current status evidence
A Saint-Mathieu-de-Beloeil spouse may have several immigration records issued at different times. Identify the status actually held and the evidence relevant to present work permission rather than choosing one document in isolation. A first review should create one status-and-document row for each family member, with the current category, admission record, expiry, and work question shown separately. That record lets the household decide whether an employer needs present evidence of an E or L spouse’s incident-to-status authorization, whether a TD spouse has no work permission, or whether a child has a separate age issue. Do not use one person’s current record to answer another person’s work question. The key is the status actually held now and the document that proves it.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Identify the actual basis for work
- Create a document chronology
- Keep the rest of the household distinct
Decide whether a spouse is being considered as a separate principal or as an eligible joining relative
A Saint-Mathieu-de-Beloeil couple may discuss two investor applications or one principal’s family case. Identify the actual structure before comparing capital, job evidence and Gold Card charges. A first review should make two separate maps: one for each EB-5 principal’s capital, source and path, at-risk position, job evidence, and management or policy role; another for the actual Gold Card applicant and official payment steps. EB-5, if approved, leads first to conditional residence. A Gold Card is not a conventional visa, and its payment is a gift by the applicant to the U.S. government rather than a private investment expected to return capital. Identify who is truly applying under each route before comparing headline amounts.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Keep EB-5 principal requirements separate from derivative eligibility
- Identify the actual Gold Card applicants and charges
- Prepare two explicit case maps for comparison