Explain how the assignment and relevant internal constraints change. The earlier floor plan should not be presented as the current operating site.
Reassess which knowledge remains applicable
The employee may understand transferable internal processes, but connect them to the new actual duties. Review material changes before relying on the earlier application account or opening schedule. When the proposed site changes, verify that any secured-premises evidence, lease documentation or facility photographs on file reflect the actual location where work will occur, not an earlier plan that has since been superseded.
A different facility often means different equipment, systems or staffing arrangements, and each of those can change what specialized knowledge the applicant actually needs to apply once work begins. Have the employer identify which processes the applicant learned abroad still function the same way at the new site and which require fresh orientation, since specialized knowledge tied to a particular physical setup does not automatically transfer to a different one. If the filing relies on the new-office provisions, update the secured-premises evidence and the showing of financial ability to match the facility actually being used, rather than the one originally proposed.
Confirm that any timeline tied to the original facility, including a target opening date, still holds before relying on it for the petition's proposed start date. Keep the earlier facility description as background for gathering evidence rather than as the record actually submitted with the filing.