Skip to content
SAINT-ISIDORE · L-1B FIELD GUIDE

Should a former colleague be paid to produce a favorable statement?

Sources checked:

THE DIRECT ANSWER

A statement must remain truthful and accurately explain the author’s knowledge. Do not purchase invented testimony or treat payment as a way to improve the underlying facts.

Agree on legitimate preparation and retrieval work

Clarify any reasonable document-retrieval, translation or professional preparation costs separately from government fees. The value of evidence comes from its reliability and relevance, not the price paid for a letter.

Budget transportation and business expenses separately from professional preparation and official charges. Separate commercial traceability work from immigration preparation, translations and current official charges. Premium processing is optional and does not improve the case. Offsite work must remain controlled by the petitioner and cannot be a labour-for-hire placement. If a former colleague is compensated at all, keep that payment limited to the reasonable time spent locating records or preparing a translation, document it clearly, and disclose it rather than leaving it unexplained in the file. Ask what independent records already exist, such as project logs, internal emails or prior performance reviews, that support the same facts the statement describes, since a letter standing alone is weaker than one corroborated by material created at the time. Keep any discussion of payment entirely separate from any discussion of what the statement should say, so the compensation can never be read as tied to its content.