Clarify the actual professional scope and current official charges. Property value does not itself establish eligibility or dictate what evidence review is required. Price the work against the questions that are actually open. Where the corporate relationship is documented and the duties are clear, review is narrow. Where ownership passed through a trust, a holding company or an informal arrangement, the tracing is the work, and it is the part worth paying for. Ask for the scope to be expressed as a list of questions rather than a package name. A scope written that way also shows, later, which questions were answered and which were merely assumed.
Separate property expenses from the transfer case
Purchases, maintenance and service contracts are business expenses with their own purposes. Immigration preparation should focus on the actual company relationship, employment and duties rather than the size of the asset portfolio. Two budgets are easy to confuse.
Money spent on the business — acquisitions, refurbishments, service contracts — buys the operation, and none of it purchases immigration eligibility. Money spent on the file buys evidence: certified corporate records, translations of foreign employment agreements, and an assessment of whether the year abroad holds. Decide what the second budget must answer before approving it, because a company that funds an impressive property brochure while leaving the ownership chain undocumented has spent on the wrong thing.
Confirm current government charges for the specific process from the official source rather than assuming a standard figure.