No. The applicable amount depends on the immigration rules and qualifying investment classification, not on a decline in assets still held outside EB-5. Reassess how the contribution will actually be funded. This is a different question from the treatment of a commercial loss after a qualifying investment has already been made.
Rebuild the funding case using current facts
Identify what cash is available now and what depends on a future sale, distribution or other event. Ask counsel about the actual proposed contribution, including any qualifying actively-investing arrangement; do not assume every future expectation is sufficient. Avoid presenting an old net-worth figure as capital already committed to the enterprise.
Put a date beside each source of funding and mark whether it is realised or expected. Cash already received sits in one column; a sale awaiting settlement, a distribution subject to a partnership vote and a property not yet listed sit in another, each with the date it is expected to convert. The applicable investment amount is fixed by the rules and the qualifying classification and does not move because a source is late, so a gap between the two columns is a planning problem to solve before commitment rather than a discrepancy to explain afterwards.
Where a statutory adjustment is scheduled to take effect, confirm which amount applies to the filing actually contemplated rather than the one discussed when planning began.