Identify actual experience, training and work showing what the applicant understands and applies. Explain the procedure in terms relevant to the proposed U.S. duties.
Show the substance behind the descriptive word
Use concrete examples and accurate attribution rather than relying on the word advanced in a letter. Identify what the record proves about the applicant and what remains an assertion needing support.
Identify relevant work in which the applicant developed or applied the knowledge, with the contributions of others accurately separated. Years on the platform, participation in its design, internal training the company itself delivered, documentation authored, and a role in prior implementations all serve. For each relevant login period, identify the project, the company process used, the employee’s contribution, a work product, and a knowledgeable supervisor who can explain it. What builds the case is material the company itself generated: internal specifications, recipes, calibration standards, development records, the record of who wrote a procedure and when. Training certificates, implementation notes, internal release histories and affidavits from knowledgeable managers can settle different parts of that map.