Provide the changed responsibilities and effective dates for assessment before relying on the earlier role analysis.
Review the practical effect
Explain whether the applicant now directs different work, loses relevant discretion or takes over routine tasks. A revised policy can matter even if the title remains unchanged. Keep the immigration strategy tied to the actual arrangement.
Review the relevant dates and qualifying employment rather than either counting every calendar day abroad on paper or treating every visit as a complete restart. A future reporting chart does not itself provide work authorization or justify describing planned support as already operational. For children, the governing fact is a date: dependent eligibility ends at twenty-one, and it should be calculated against the relevant filing and extension dates at the start of the process rather than assumed to be comfortable. A new-office case and an established operation may require different evidence, but neither permits a fictional staffing account. A first review should calendar the proposed filing and travel dates against the employment records, then address travel, leave and US work history before a shortfall becomes an avoidable timing problem.